But was it inspiration? (image from here) |
To inspire, it suggests, is to cheer, give courage, or make pious.
Inspired relates to being intuitive, diffuse, forceful, induced, scriptural, revelational, pietistic -- and inspiring, to causal, influential, exciting.
What do we take from an inspiring exhibition, then? The artist's influence on us, perhaps ... a stirring of our imagination, that induces us to make our own work; it reveals something, gets us excited or gives us a warm feeling, cheers us up perhaps, or gives us courage to think about difficult things.
Or perhaps simply that we understand the artist, the work, the world, ourselves, a little better?
1 comment:
Re your illustration: was it inspiration, or was it influence?
I think that inspiration can be several of the things you listed, or a combination of them. And I agree with that last sentence.
There are different kinds of inspiration: some quiet and thought-provoking (although the thinking can be quite exciting), and other inspiration generating instant scalp-tingling and finger-twitching - an urge to go to work on one's own art immediately.
Post a Comment